Close Menu
TechurzTechurz

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    CISOs brace for an “AI vs. AI” fight

    October 16, 2025

    How emerging Mubadala-backed AAF is winning VC deals in some of the hottest startups

    October 16, 2025

    Why the F5 Hack Created an ‘Imminent Threat’ for Thousands of Networks

    October 16, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • CISOs brace for an “AI vs. AI” fight
    • How emerging Mubadala-backed AAF is winning VC deals in some of the hottest startups
    • Why the F5 Hack Created an ‘Imminent Threat’ for Thousands of Networks
    • Last 48 hours to save before the Disrupt 2025 flash sale ends
    • Is a $300 Windows laptop worth buying? This Acer model gave me a resounding yes
    • How a headphone site operator built loyalty startup Lantern to solve his own problems
    • North Korean Hackers Use EtherHiding to Hide Malware Inside Blockchain Smart Contracts
    • Rent a Cyber Friend will pay you to talk to strangers online and will show off its platform at TechCrunch Disrupt 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    TechurzTechurz
    • Home
    • AI
    • Apps
    • News
    • Guides
    • Opinion
    • Reviews
    • Security
    • Startups
    TechurzTechurz
    Home»Guides»Why most companies shouldn’t build their own AI solutions
    Guides

    Why most companies shouldn’t build their own AI solutions

    TechurzBy TechurzJune 6, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    a hand open with the words chatgpt and ai hovering
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    AI isn’t hype anymore—it’s real. IDC predicts that by 2028 AI spending could hit $623 billion by 2028. That kind of investment doesn’t come from buzz. It comes from companies seeing real value.

    AI tools are already cutting costs, speeding up work, and – let’s be honest – making jobs more enjoyable. Nobody misses the repetitive stuff. Instead, we’re doing more of what we’re actually good at: strategy, creativity, and problem-solving.

    So now that companies have tasted that value, many want to go further. Not just use AI—but build entire internal AI-powered solutions themselves. Stitch together some models, build an app, launch it to their teams. The thinking goes: if off-the-shelf tools work, imagine how great it’ll be if we control the whole thing.


    You may like

    Here’s the reality: for most companies, especially non-tech companies, building in-house AI solutions is a bad bet. They take too long, cost too much, and rarely deliver what the business actually needs.

    Let’s talk about why.

    Jean-Marc Chanoine

    Social Links Navigation

    SVP of Business Development, Templafy.

    It’s not about the model. It’s about the missing link Between tech and impact.

    Companies are already experimenting with models. They’re using GPTs, building copilots, testing agents. That’s not the problem. The problem is believing the solution is just about picking a model or wiring one together. That’s not where most projects fail.

    They fail because the solution—how it fits into your workflows, your systems, your people—isn’t well thought out. It’s fragmented. It’s not scalable. It doesn’t stick. The model might be powerful, but the experience around it doesn’t work. And without that, the value never materializes. This is why the connective layer matters.

    The interface. The orchestration. The automation. The safeguards. It’s what turns “we have a model” into “we’re driving results.” And most companies don’t have the internal expertise to build that layer right.

    Going solo comes with hidden costs

    Trying to build your own AI-powered solution might feel brave. But unless your company is a product and engineering company, the odds are stacked against you.

    Here’s where most organizations get it wrong:

    1. You Don’t Have the UX Muscle

    AI only delivers value when people actually use it. That means seamless, intuitive, trustworthy interfaces. Most enterprises don’t have the product design and UX software and development capabilities to build interfaces that users actually want to engage with. Internal tools often look—and perform—like science experiments.

    2. You’re Flying Blind

    Vendors bring learning from hundreds of deployments. You don’t. If you’re rolling out a custom AI solution based on a few internal tests and gut instinct, you’re guessing. You don’t have enough data to know what “good” looks like—or what real adoption takes.

    3. You’re Not Budgeting for What Comes Next

    AI isn’t static. Models evolve. Interfaces break. User needs change. If you’re not committing budget and headcount for constant iteration, retraining, and support, that in-house solution will be outdated in under a year. And it will sit unused, no matter how promising it looked at launch.

    4. Security Concerns Are Overblown

    Yes, protecting data is critical. But assuming vendor AI tools are inherently less secure? That’s a flawed take. The best AI providers build with security and compliance at the core. If you trust cloud infrastructure, you can trust enterprise-grade AI vendors.

    5. “Only We Know Our Business” Misses the Point

    Your internal team knows your business better. That’s not in question. But they likely don’t know how to build scalable, production-ready AI. Vendors do. They’ve already solved the engineering challenges, the data problems, the deployment mess. Why start from scratch?

    If you’re not a tech company, stop trying to be one. There’s no shame in partnering with experts—it’s how the winners win faster.

    Agentic AI is coming—and it’s even harder to build right

    The next phase is agentic AI. These systems don’t just generate—they act. They make decisions. They learn. They execute. It’s already revolutionizing workstreams like customer service, reporting, and document creation.

    But these aren’t lightweight features. They’re full systems—requiring real orchestration, context awareness, governance, and maintenance. Trying to build them internally without the right foundation? That’s not just inefficient. It’s risky.

    You don’t need to build these things. You need to leverage the companies that already have.

    AI is a team sport, play with the pros

    AI feels like it’s getting easier. And in some ways, it is. Open-source models. No-code platforms. Accessible APIs.

    But building an AI solution that actually moves the needle? That’s still hard. Really hard. And if you think your internal team can replicate what vendors have spent years perfecting, you’re wasting time—and likely money.

    The smartest companies aren’t trying to do it all themselves. They’re focusing on what they do best and partnering for the rest.

    AI is a team sport. Play with the pros.

    That’s how you win.

    LINK!

    This article was produced as part of TechRadarPro’s Expert Insights channel where we feature the best and brightest minds in the technology industry today. The views expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily those of TechRadarPro or Future plc. If you are interested in contributing find out more here: https://www.techradar.com/news/submit-your-story-to-techradar-pro

    build Companies Shouldnt Solutions
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleElon Musk Is Posting Through It
    Next Article Micro-Retirement? Quit Your Job Before You’re a Millionaire
    Techurz
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinion

    Sheryl Sandberg-backed Flint wants to use AI to autonomously build and update websites

    October 14, 2025
    Opinion

    India’s Airbound bags $8.65M to build rocket-like drones for one-cent deliveries

    October 14, 2025
    Opinion

    Can AI companies turn brainrot into revenue?

    October 3, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    The Reason Murderbot’s Tone Feels Off

    May 14, 20259 Views

    Start Saving Now: An iPhone 17 Pro Price Hike Is Likely, Says New Report

    August 17, 20258 Views

    CNET’s Daily Tariff Price Tracker: I’m Keeping Tabs on Changes as Trump’s Trade Policies Shift

    May 27, 20258 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    The Reason Murderbot’s Tone Feels Off

    May 14, 20259 Views

    Start Saving Now: An iPhone 17 Pro Price Hike Is Likely, Says New Report

    August 17, 20258 Views

    CNET’s Daily Tariff Price Tracker: I’m Keeping Tabs on Changes as Trump’s Trade Policies Shift

    May 27, 20258 Views
    Our Picks

    CISOs brace for an “AI vs. AI” fight

    October 16, 2025

    How emerging Mubadala-backed AAF is winning VC deals in some of the hottest startups

    October 16, 2025

    Why the F5 Hack Created an ‘Imminent Threat’ for Thousands of Networks

    October 16, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    © 2025 techurz. Designed by Pro.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.