Close Menu
TechurzTechurz

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    What's Hot

    Why top talent is walking away from OpenAI and xAI

    February 13, 2026

    Fusion startup Helion hits blistering temps as it races toward 2028 deadline

    February 13, 2026

    AI burnout, billion-dollar bets, and Silicon Valley’s Epstein problem

    February 13, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • Why top talent is walking away from OpenAI and xAI
    • Fusion startup Helion hits blistering temps as it races toward 2028 deadline
    • AI burnout, billion-dollar bets, and Silicon Valley’s Epstein problem
    • Score, the dating app for people with good credit, is back
    • Didero lands $30M to put manufacturing procurement on ‘agentic’ autopilot
    • Eclipse backs all-EV marketplace Ever in $31M funding round
    • Complyance raises $20M to help companies manage risk and compliance
    • Meridian raises $17 million to remake the agentic spreadsheet
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest Vimeo
    TechurzTechurz
    • Home
    • AI
    • Apps
    • News
    • Guides
    • Opinion
    • Reviews
    • Security
    • Startups
    TechurzTechurz
    Home»News»Your Apple Watch Might Not Be as Accurate as You Think, New Study Finds
    News

    Your Apple Watch Might Not Be as Accurate as You Think, New Study Finds

    TechurzBy TechurzJune 4, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Share Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Reddit Telegram Email
    Apple Watch Series 9
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    The first thing that always crosses my mind when testing fitness wearables is how accurate the data is. Smartwatches and fitness trackers aren’t cheap, and if you’re using them to monitor something as crucial as your health, then accuracy matters.

    Everyone and their brother wear some sort of fitness tracker, whether it be an Apple Watch, Google Pixel Watch, Oura Ring or Whoop. It’s estimated that one in three Americans uses a wearable device for health and fitness tracking features. That brings me back to whether these things can be trusted. If they’re not accurate… What’s the point? Should we all go back to analog?

    Researchers from the University of Mississippi conducted a meta-analysis of 56 studies that compared the Apple Watch with reference tools when measuring factors like heart rate, step count and energy burned. While there’s always some expected error, we have a more definitive answer for how much stock you should put in the numbers you see on your watch.

    Apple Watches are good at measuring steps and heart rate

    The meta-analysis findings show that the Apple Watch accurately measures your heart rate and step count. We know this based on the mean absolute percentage error measurement (the standard way to measure accuracy) reported for each health metric. 

    Heart rate had a percentage error of 4.43%, while step count had an error of 8.17%. Anything below 10% is considered excellent, so you should feel pretty confident in what your Apple Watch says your heart rate and step count are for the day.

    However, you shouldn’t rely on the energy expenditure metric

    The same can’t be said for energy expenditure or calories burned. The percentage error for this metric was 27.96%. That’s a significant jump in inaccuracy. Researchers found energy expenditure inaccurate across all activities tested, including walking, running, mixed-intensity workouts and cycling.

    This isn’t a new problem. Several studies have found that smartwatches and trackers don’t do a great job of calculating calorie burn. They can be off by 40% to 80%. A different study revealed that the Apple Watch Series 9 can vary in energy expenditure and heart rate measures across skin pigmentation.

    While this study was specific to Apple Watches, I expect similar trends across other devices because they often measure similarly. One study found that the Fitbit Surge had a mean error of 27% when measuring calories burned. 

    Smartwatches calculate how many calories you burn throughout the day, using factors such as your movements, heart rate and data from the sensors inside the watch. Other factors, such as your age, weight and gender, are also included in this calculation. None of them will be 100% accurate.

    Where does this leave you and your data? 

    This news doesn’t scare me as a smartwatch wearer who uses my daily data to track my workouts and sleep. I still think the data smartwatches give us is a great way to stay motivated. 

    I’ve used the Google Pixel 3 watch to monitor my heart health thanks to the cardio load metric. When it comes to sleep, I’ve noticed some inaccuracy when it comes to when I fall asleep and wake up, though it’s not a huge difference. Most trackers use your heart rate and movement to track your sleep, so it’s unsurprising to see some degree of error. There’s always some error, and for my use, that’s OK. I use my data for trends of my progress, rather than extremely granular data. Though if you’re a serious athlete who tracks down to the calorie, it’s essential not to rely on your smartwatch for this number.

    Your smartwatch is a tool to guide you through your wellness journey. Use it to build habits and make meaningful changes, not diagnose medical conditions. That said, I wouldn’t count out smartwatch features like Apple’s Vital app, fall detection or the loss-of-pulse detection feature that Google Pixel watches are getting. 

    Apple and other brands continuously release updates to improve their tech over time. And if you’re wondering which smartwatch you should get for the best accuracy, it’s hard to say. They all have their own tracking methods, even if they often overlap. None of them are perfect, so it’s best to choose which one fits your budget and vibe best.

    accurate Apple finds study Watch
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Previous ArticleMicrosoft Surface Pro 12-inch review
    Next Article This Is Your Last Chance to Save Your Samsung Account Before Its Deleted
    Techurz
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Opinion

    Apple buys Israeli startup Q.ai as the AI race heats up

    January 29, 2026
    Opinion

    Meta-backed Hupo finds growth after pivot to AI sales coaching from mental wellness

    January 13, 2026
    Opinion

    Fleet Space finds massive lithium deposit using AI and satellites

    November 25, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    College social app Fizz expands into grocery delivery

    September 3, 20251,561 Views

    A Former Apple Luminary Sets Out to Create the Ultimate GPU Software

    September 25, 202514 Views

    The Reason Murderbot’s Tone Feels Off

    May 14, 202511 Views
    Stay In Touch
    • Facebook
    • YouTube
    • TikTok
    • WhatsApp
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
    Latest Reviews

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest tech news from FooBar about tech, design and biz.

    Most Popular

    College social app Fizz expands into grocery delivery

    September 3, 20251,561 Views

    A Former Apple Luminary Sets Out to Create the Ultimate GPU Software

    September 25, 202514 Views

    The Reason Murderbot’s Tone Feels Off

    May 14, 202511 Views
    Our Picks

    Why top talent is walking away from OpenAI and xAI

    February 13, 2026

    Fusion startup Helion hits blistering temps as it races toward 2028 deadline

    February 13, 2026

    AI burnout, billion-dollar bets, and Silicon Valley’s Epstein problem

    February 13, 2026

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Disclaimer
    © 2026 techurz. Designed by Pro.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.