Following backlash about a quietly added clause to SoundCloud’s Terms of Use that says users’ content may be fed to AI, the company says it’s “never used artist content to train AI models,” and insists it “has always been and will remain artist-first.” The outrage came after tech ethicist Ed Newton-Rex (via TechCrunch) spotted a change to SoundCloud’s terms that was made in February 2024 seemingly without notifying users. The updated text states that by using the platform, “You explicitly agree that your Content may be used to inform, train, develop or serve as input to artificial intelligence or machine intelligence technologies or services as part of and for providing the services.”
In a statement to TechCrunch, a spokesperson said the update was only meant to “clarify how content may interact with AI technologies within SoundCloud’s own platform” and that the company “has never used artist content to train AI models, nor do we develop AI tools or allow third parties to scrape or use SoundCloud content from our platform for AI training purposes.” SoundCloud’s official Reddit account posted similar statements on the social media platform in response to users’ outrage, and both noted that SoundCloud added a “no AI” tag for artists “to explicitly prohibit unauthorized use.”
AI may be used for things like music recommendations, playlist creation and fraud detection, the company said. “Any future AI tools will be built for artists to enhance discovery, protect rights, and expand opportunities,” SoundCloud posted on Reddit. “We hear your concerns and remain committed to transparency, artist control, and fair use.”
Just a few months ago, though, SoundCloud introduced a suite of AI tools geared toward music creation, on top of three others it had announced earlier that year. That includes AI tools for generating remixes, new tracks, beats and singing voices.
